Tuesday, 17 April 2012

An Essay on Hypochondriasis

1.     Introduction 
Hypochondriasis is one of the most frequent seen somatoform patterns, with a prevalence in general medical practice of between 4 and 9 percent. The disorder is characterized by multiple and stubbornly held complaints about possible physical illness even though no evidence of such illness can be found. Hypochondriacal complains are usually not restricted to any physiologically coherent symptom pattern; rather, they express a preoccupation with health matters and unrealistic fears of disease. Although hypochondriacal people repeatedly seek medical advice, their concerns are not in the least lessened by their doctors’ reassurances- in fact they are frequently disappointed when no physical problem is found.  
In the past hypochondriasis was considered as mental illness but the later researches prove that it is rather an anxiety disorder. Because it is characterized by anxiety or fear that one has a serious disease. Therefore, the essential problem is anxiety, but its expression is different from that of the other anxiety disorders. In hypochondriasis, the individual is preoccupied with bodily symptoms, misinterpreting them as indicative of illness or disease. Almost any physical sensation may become the basis for concern for individuals with hypochondrioasis. Some may focus on normal bodily functions such as a cough. Some individuals complain of very vague symptoms, such as aches or fatigue.

2.     Clinical description
Like many terms in psychopathology, hypochondriasis has ancient roots. To the Greeks, the “hypochondria” was the region below the ribs, and the organs in this region affected mental state. For example, ulcers and abdominal disorders were once considered part of the hypochondriacal syndrome. As the actual causes of such disorders were discovered, physical complaints without a clear cause continued to be labeled hypochondreasis. In hypochondriasis, severe anxiety is focused on the possibility of having serious disease. The threat seems so real that no amount of reassurance, even from physicians, will help for long.
3.     Major characteristics
Individuals with hypochondriasis may complain of uncomfortable and peculiar sensations in the general area of the stomach, chest, head, genitals, or anywhere else in the body. Complete physical examination and investigations do not show presence of any significant abnormality. They usually have trouble giving a precise description of their symptoms, however. They may begin by mentioning pain in the stomach, which on further questioning is not really a pain but a gnawing sensation, or perhaps a feeling of heat, or of pressure. The mental orientation of these individuals keeps them constantly on the alert for new symptoms.
Hypochondriarcal patients are likely to be avid readers of popular magazines on medical topics and are apt to feel certain that they are suffering from every new disease they read or hear about. Tuberculosis, cancer, exotic infections, and numerous other diseases are readily self-diagnosed by these individuals. Their morbid preoccupation with bodily processes, coupled with their often limited knowledge of medical pathology leads to some interesting diagnoses. Such individuals are sure they are seriously ill and cannot recover. Yet- and this is revealing – despite their exaggerated concerns over their health, they do not usually show the intense fear or anxiety that might be expected of those suffering from such horrible ills. In fact they are usually in good physical condition. Nevertheless, they are sincere in their conviction that the symptoms they detect represent real illness. Hypochondriacal persons often show a notable preoccupation with digestive and excretory functions. Some keep charts of their bowel movements, and most are able to give detailed information concerning diet, constipation and related matters. Many as suggested earlier, use a wide range of self-medications of the type frequently advertised on television.  However, they do not show the losses or distortions of sensory, motor and visceral functioning that occur in conversion disorder; nor so their complaints have the bizarre delusional quality- such as “insides rotting away” or “lungs drying up”- that occurs in some psychotic disorders.
4.     Statistics
We know very little about the prevalence of hypochondriasis in the general population. Early estimates indicate that anywhere between 1% and 14% of medical patients are diagnosed with hypochondriasis. Later estimates cite a range of 4% to 9% of patients in general medical practice. Although historically considered one of the “hysterical” disorders unique to women, the sex ratio is actually 50-50. It was thought for a long time that hypochondriasis was more prevalent in elderly populations, but this does not seem to be true. In fact, hypochondriasis is spread fairly evenly across various phases of adulthood. Naturally more elderly people go to see physicians, making the absolute number of patients in this age group somewhat higher than in the younger population. Hypocondriasis may emerge at any time of life, with the peak age periods found in adolescence, middle age (40s and 50s), and age 60.
5.     Causes
Investigators with generally differing points of view agree or psychopathological processes ongoing in hypochondriasis faulty interpretation of physical signs and sensations as evidence of physical illness is central, so almost everyone agrees that hypochondriasis is basically a disorder of cognition or perception with strong emotional contributions.
Individuals with hypochondriasis experience physical sensations that are common to all of us, but they quickly focus their attention to these sensations. Remember that the very act of focusing on yourself increases arousal and makes the physical sensations seem more intensive than they actually are. If you also tend t misinterpret these as symptoms of illness, your anxiety well increase further. Increased anxiety produces additional physical symptoms, in a vicious cycle. Using procedures from cognitive science such as the Stoop test, Hithcock and Mathews confirmed that subjects with hypochondriasis show enhanced perceptual sensitivity to illness cues. They also tent to interpret ambiguous stimuli as threatening. Thus, they quickly become aware of any sign of possible illness or disease. A minor headache, for example, might be interpreted as a sure sign of a brain tumor. Once again, this cycle is similar to what happens in panic disorder.
What causes individuals to develop this pattern of somatic sensitivity and distorted believes? Although we are not sure, we can safely say the solution is unlikely to be found in isolated biological or psychological factors.  There is every reason to believe that the fundamental causes of hypochondriasis runs in families a possible genetic contribution may be nonspecific, such as a tendency to over respond to stress, and thus may be indistinguishable from the nonspecific genetic contribution to anxiety disorders. Hypperresponsivity might combine with a tendency to view negative life events as unpredictable and uncontrollable and therefore, to be guarded against at all times.                                                                                 
We know that children with hypochondriacal concerns often report the same kinds of symptoms that other family members may have reported at one time. It is therefore quite possible, as in panic disorder, that individuals who develop hypochondriasis have learned from family members to focus their anxiety on specific physical conditions and illness.
Three other factors may contribute to this etiological process. First, hypochondriasis seems to develop in the context of a stressful life event, as do many disorders, including anxiety disorders. Such events often involve death or illness. Second, people who develop hypochondriasis tend to have had a disproportionate incidence of disease in their family when they were children. Thus, even if they did not develop hypondriasis until adulthood, they carry strong memories of illness that could easily become the focus of anxiety. Third, an important social and interpersonal influence may be operating. Some people who come from families where illness is a major issue seem to have learned that an ill person is often paid increased attention. The “benefits” of being sick might contribute to the development of the disorder. A sick person who thus receives more attention and less responsibility is described as adopting a sick role. These issues may be even more significant in somatization disorder.
6.     Treatment
Unfortunately, we know very little about treating hypochondriasis. Scientifically controlled studies have appeared only recently. Warwick, Clark, Cobb and Salkovskis randomly assigned 32 patients to either cognitive behavioral therapy or a no-treatment wait-list control group. Treatment focused on identifying and challenging illness related misinterpretation of physical sensations and on showing patients how to create “symptoms” by focusing attention on certain body areas. Bringing on their own symptoms persuaded many patients that such events were under their control. Patients were also coached to seek less reassurance regarding their concerns. Patients in the treatment group improved an average of 76% and those in the wait-list group only 5%; benefits were maintained for 3 months.
Although it is common clinical practice to uncover unconscious conflicts through psychodynamic psychotherapy, results on the effectiveness of this kind of treatment have seldom been reported. Surprisingly, clinical reports indicate that reassurance seems to be effective in some cases, because patients with hypochondriasis are not supposed to benefit from reassurance about their health. However, reassurance is usually given only very briefly by family doctors have little tome to provide the ongoing support and reassurance that might be necessary. Mental health professionals may well be able to offer reassurance in a more effective and sensitive manner, devote sufficient time to all the concerns the patient may have, and attend to the meaning of the symptoms. Participation in support groups may also give these people the reassurance they need. It is very likely we will see more research on the treatment of hypochondriasis in the future.
Conclusion
Most of us as children learn well the lesson that, when we are sick, special comforts and attention are provided and, furthermore, that we are excused from a number of responsibilities or at least are not expected to perform certain chores up to par. This lesson has been learned all too well by the hypochondriarchal adult. Such an adult is in effect saying I deserve more of your attention and concern and you may not legitimately expect me to perform as a well person would. Typically these messages are conveyed with more than a touch of angry rebuke, inconsolable demand.
Hypochondriasis may be viewed as a certain type of needful interpersonal communication as well as a disorder involving abnormal preoccupation with disease. Treatment of the latter in the absence of an appreciation of the former frequently produces clinical frustration, if not exasperation. In fact, it may be that the impatience with which many physicians react to these patients has the unintended effect of maintaining or increasing their fears of abandonment and an early demise from some terrible condition that remains undetected by an insufficiently caring physician.  








An Essay on Crowd

1.0 Introduction
A crowd is a temporary collection of people who gather around some person or event and who are conscious of and influenced by one another. Crowds differ from other social groups primarily in that they are short-lived, are only loosely structured, and use conventional spaces or buildings for unconventional purposes.
A crowd is quickly created and quickly dissolved. It is an unorganized manifestation occurring in a world of organization. Often the people collected in a garden for a picnic are called crowd but instead of calling them a crowd they may be termed aggregates. The crowd is a physical compact aggregation of human beings brought into direct, temporary and unorganized contact, reaching mostly to the same stimuli and in a similar way. A crowd is always a transitory and unstable organization.
2.0.Definitions
Maclver defines crowd as a “physical compact aggregation of human beings brought into direct, temporary and unorganized contact with one another.”
Kimball Young defines crowd as a “gathering of a considerable number of persons around a centre or point of common attraction.”
According to Contrill “crowd is a congregate group of individuals who have temporarily identified themselves with common values and who are expressing similar emotions.”
3.0.Characteristics of Crowd
The following are the characteristic features of a crowd:
1)     Physical presence
Without such physical presence there can be no crowd. The size of the crowd is limited by the distance, which the eye can see and the ear can hear. Since people cannot remain physically present for any great length of time, this means that the crowd is a temporary social group. The crowd is unorganized. It may have a leader but it has no division of labour. As members of the crowd all the individuals are alike because it has no organization which can utilize the individual differences.

2)     Anonymity
Crowds are anonymous, both because they are large and they are temporary. A crowd usually consists of a relatively large number of people. The members of a crowd do not know each other. They do not pay attention to other members as individuals. The individual in a crowd is free to indulge in behavior which he would ordinarily control. In a crowd moral responsibility is shifted from the individual to the group.
3)     Narrow attention
The crowd is devoid of a wide attention. It directs its attention only to one or two things at one time. It is incapable of rationality and is easily carried by intuition. The members of the crowd easily come under the magic influences of a skilful orator.
4)     The members of the crowd are not open to conviction.
They do not tolerate any opposition to their views, rather any opposition enrages them. They blindly accept the stories that suit their temper and openly reject any suggestion opposed to it.
5)     Credulity
With an increase in the capacity of suggestibility, the credulity of a crowd also increases. According to Ross, “Rational analysis and test are out of question. The faculties we deal with are asleep.”
6)     Low mental level
The ideas of a crowd are not wide or deep. They are charged with emotion. They do not see any reason in other’s arguments. One may make a crowd do anything. The individual’s power of volition is lost.  It is all due to low mental level of the crowd.
7)     Emotional
The members of a crowd are highly emotional, they respond not only to the emotional situation, but also the emotions to the emotions of other members of the crowd. Some members of the crowd get excited because the other members are excited. The members of the crowd do not know what they are doing. In the words of Bernhard, “it is usually some strong emotions or curiosity impulse which integrates the crowd.”
8)     Irresponsibility
From the viewpoint of responsibility the members of the crowd show very poor sense of it. When panic or hatred seizes them, they do the most shameful acts of which they themselves repent afterwards.  A crowd in action can be a terrifying thing. Lebon has written, “The sense of responsibility which always controls individuals disappears entirely in a crowd.”
4.0.Kinds of Crowds
Crowds are generally divided into two classes:
4.1.  Active crowd
4.2.  Inactive crowd
4.1. Active crowd
According to Kimball Young, “an active crowd is a mass of individuals who, with the common focus of attentions unleash certain deep lying attitudes, emotions and actions.” It is accidental and momentary. It is motivated by a common motive and behaves the same way to realize a common end.
The active crowd has been classified into five kinds:
4.1.1       Aggressive crowd
4.1.2       Panicky crowd
4.1.3       Acquisitive crowd
4.1.4       Expressive crowd
4.1.1. Aggressive crowd:
An aggressive crowd, as the name suggests, consists of people in an aggressive mood, capable of any destruction and inhumanity. It may commit arson and murder, rape and manhandling. The atmosphere is full of great excitement. The members of such a crowd are completely devoid of any reason or sense of poverty whatsoever.
The special features of an aggressive crowd are as following:
a)     Intense emotionality
An aggressive crowd is marked is marked by intense emotionality. All individuals are in highly excited mood. In such a crowd we find one man shouting at the top of his voice, another waving his fists about, some running around, others manhandling.
b)     Suggestibility
The reason of the individual is dulled in an aggressive crowd. Every one imitates everyone else. A handful of people by their tactical methods succeed in blunting the reason of the hundreds of people who do not know what and why of their actions.

c)     Influence of rumour
Sometimes people collect in a crowd upon hearing some or the other rumour. A not unknown example is the rumour that a student has been beaten by a police constable at a cinema house. In no time many students gather together aroused to a high pitch of anger and having equipped themselves with haste rather than discrimination proceed towards the cinema house. They see a police constable on the crossroads and give him a beating who has nothing to do with the whole affair. They reach the cinema house and find there neither any student nor any constable.
d)     Tendency of imitation
In an aggressive crowd the members imitate each other and do not employ their reasoning power.
e)     Similar behavior
The behavior of the members of an aggressive crowd takes a single line. They are not prepared to listen to the arguments of the other side, neither are they interested in finding out the truth of the matter. Whatever has gone into their heads is difficult to be taken out by reason and arguments. They are bent up to the cause they have taken up to promote.
f)      Low educational level
The aggressive crowd is generally composed of people who are not highly educated or are uneducated. Even in an aggressive crowd of students the most active ones are those who are not interested in studies. Serious and intelligent students rarely are the members of an aggressive crowd.  
g)     Importance of leader
In an aggressive crowd the leader plays a very important role in rousing the emotions of the members. He excites them with his words and his gestures. He is the first to attack and exhorts the crowd to make an attack. He sets the example, which the crowd follows. He exercises a magnetic influence upon the members.
4.1.2. Panicky crowd
A panicky crowd is one, which is fear stricken and whose members are running hither and thither to save their lives. During war time a panicky crowd is a common phenomenon. In a panicky crowd every member is aware of the presence of the trouble. There is a feeling of fear, which spreads like contagion. All members think of things going out of their control. Their prime concern is to save their lives and they exhibit a lot of courage to save their life. The members exhibit fear because of crisis and this causes a tendency to escape.

4.1.3. Acquisitive crowd
The acquisitive crowd is one whose members have gathered together in order to acquire something. A crowd before the cinema booking window is such a crowd. Likewise, a crowd before a rationing shop to get sugar is an acquisitive crowd. Thus the acquisitive crowd is composed of individuals whose object is to gain something.
4.1.4.     Expressive crowd
In an expressive crowd the individuals gather together to give expression or to manifest their demands or sentiments. A not uncommon occurrence in the colleges is that the students come out of the examination hall whenever they find a question paper difficult or outside the prescribed course of study. They gather together before the principal’s office and put forth their demands that the examination be postponed and the question paper be reset. The members of an expressive crowd are interested more in voicing their grievances than in destruction. The expressive crowd may turn into an aggressive crowd if an effort is made to disperse it by violent means.
4.2.     Inactive Crowd
An inactive crowd is rather an audience, which collect for some peaceful purpose, for example, to seek some information or to hear a religious discourse. The action of inactive crowd does nto show any change even after an hour or two whereas in an aggressive crowd changes can be seen after a few minutes only. The difference between the active crowd and inactive crwd is only relative. The active crowd is somewhat more active while the inactive crowd is relatively inactive. An inactive crowd may be classified into:
4.2.1.     Information seeking crowd
4.2.2.     Recreation seeking crowd
4.2.3.     Conversation crowd

4.2.1. Information seeking crowd:
 This type of group gets together to gain knowledge or collect information. The aim is information. The members behave in an organized manner. A leader is heart of a large number of people.


4.2.3. Recreation seeking crowd:
The aim of recreation seeking crowd is to be entertained. A crowd gathers to witness a cinema. The object of such crowd is recreation. The conduct of the members is not controlled.
4.2.4.     Conversational crowd:
Such a crowd collects to exchange ideas and feelings for transformation. During election political parties try to convert the masses to their own way of thinking.
Lebon divided crowds into two categories:
1)     Homogeneous and
2)     Heterogeneneous.
The heterogeneous crowds may be anonymous like street crowds or non-anonymous like parliamentary assemblies. The homogeneous crowd may be sects, castes and classes.  
Blumer divides crowds into four categories
1.     the casual crowd
2.     the conventional crowd
3.     the expressive crowd and
4.     the active crowd
5.0. Theories of crowd   
Though it cannot be denied that the crowd also possesses a capacity for constructive work, yet its’ destructive character which has forced sociologists and psychologists to devote their attention to it. Many theories have been advanced to explain why the crowd behaves in a particular way.
5.1. Group mind theory:
According to the group mind theory the individual in the crowd loses his individuality and becomes a part of the crowd which comes to develop its own crowd consciousness. The crowd consciousness supplants the individual consciousness of the individuals. The members of the crowd participate in the crowd consciousness and act according to the stimulus provided by the crowd. The mentality of the individual members becomes de-individualized and he begins to act on an emotional level, which is common to all the participants. According to this theory, the crowd becomes so attuned that it responds only to the appeal, the slogans, and the ideas which are comfortable to the deindividualized mentality. The group- mind which is not the sum of the minds of the members of the group is a mind of its own distinct from minds working on different levels. Its working is based on emotions, appeals, suggestions and slogans. Its acts are less rational and more emotional. It is an irresponsible mind focusing its attention on some immediate object. Its mental level is very low. It becomes easily excited and acts in a hypnotic way. It is on this account that individuals behave most irrationally in a crowd than otherwise behave individually.
The Group- mind theory has been advocated by Lebon, Espinas, Trotter, Durkheim, McDougall Allport.
5.2. Lebon’s theory:
Lebon was the first writer to put forward the theory of group-mind in 1892. In his book crowds he has written, “the sentiments and ideas of all the persons in the gathering take one and the same direction and their conscious personality vanishes. A collective mind is formed, doubtless transitory but presenting very clearly defined characterstics.” Thus, according to Lebon, the different individuals in a group do not think individually but think experience and act through group mind. When individuals collect in a crowd, their individual minds become a part of the collective mind. The collective mind thinks in its own way and formulates its own ideas and thoughts which the individual minds do not formulate in their individuals capacities. In the crowd the mind of the individual acts in a manner in which it would not act if left alone.
Lebon has laid great emphasis on the unconscious motives. According to him, in a crowd these unconscious motives get more active. The individual is influenced by these unconscious motives and his own conscious motivation sinks into the background. In a group, the individual gets a sense of invincible power and hence, he tries to completely satisfy his instinctive passion in him. 
5.3. Durkheim’s theory:
Durkheim has sought to explain group behavior in terms of collective consciousness. According to him, when people collect in a group, a collective consciousness is created by the mutual exchange of ideas and notions. Mind is another name for the flow of consciousness. When several minds meet together there is a flow of consciousness is created which is not just a collection of consciousness of various individuals. Just as a chemical compound of several elements but its qualities are different from the qualities of the consciousness of the individual. According to Durkheim, the social consciousness is more superior and comprehensive than the individual consciousness.
6.0. The social psychology of Crowds
Until recently, mobs were seen as little more than unchained beasts, spurred by powerful, violent urges and with no sense of reason. What people did in crowd was seen not as the collective action of rational humans, but as collective behavior that was the result of regression to primitive levels of psychology. A chief proponent of this psychological perspective was the Frenchman Gustave lebon. As far as Lebon was concerned, the old social system, with its privileges and security for elites like himself, was being threatened by emotionally volatile mobs. Lebon regarded mobs as purely irrational and destructive, capable of treating apart the social order.
In his book the psychology of crowds Lebon argued that involvement in a crowd puts individuals “in a possession of a collective mind” that makes them think, feel, and act quite differently than they would if each person were alone. Crowds, Lebon maintained, gain control over people much as hypnotists do. Waves of emotions sweep through crowds, infecting one person after another. 
7.0.Conclusion
In our everyday life we use the word ‘crowd’ without any consideration for any group of people. If more than expected number of people gather at a place, we say that there is crowd or rush. If there are 10-15 customers at a shop, we generally say that it is a crowd there. But in psychology only more number of people cannot be called crowd. From psychology view point, the existence of crowd is not based on more number of people, but physical presence of people is needed for making it a crowd. People so gather in a crowd that they do not establish indirect or definite relations. The attention and feelings of people should be toward a common thing, person or incident to make it a crowd. The gathered persons are in such proximity to each other that they are alive to the presence to other. They are aware of their collective power. Their focal point too is one and their desires are directed to one point. If all these characteristics are found in a gathering, we would say that a crowd has been created according to psychological view point.